Evaluation measures (information retrieval)

« Back to Glossary Index

Background and Importance of Evaluation Measures in Information Retrieval
– Indexing and classification methods have a long history in information retrieval.
– Evaluation measures for IR systems began in the 1950s with the Cranfield paradigm.
– The Cranfield tests established the use of test collections, queries, and relevant items for evaluation.
– Cleverdon’s approach influenced the Text Retrieval Conference series.
– Evaluation measures are crucial for search engines, databases, and library catalogues.
– Evaluation of IR systems is essential for internet search, website search, and library catalogues.
– Evaluation measures are used in information behavior studies and usability testing.
– Academic conferences like TREC, CLEF, and NTCIR focus on evaluation measures.
– IR research relies on test collections and evaluation measures to measure system effectiveness.
– Evaluation measures help assess business costs and efficiency.
– Evaluation measures in information retrieval are used to assess the effectiveness and performance of search algorithms and systems.
– These measures play a crucial role in determining the quality of search results and the overall user experience.
– They provide a standardized way to compare different retrieval systems and algorithms.
– Evaluation measures help researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions regarding the design and improvement of information retrieval systems.

Online and Offline Evaluation Metrics
– Online metrics are derived from search logs.
– Online metrics are used to determine the success of A/B tests.
– Session abandonment rate measures the ratio of search sessions without clicks.
– Click-through rate (CTR) measures the ratio of users who click on a specific link.
– Session success rate measures the ratio of user sessions that lead to a successful result.
– Offline metrics are based on relevance judgment sessions.
– Judges score the quality of search results using binary or multi-level scales.
– Precision measures the fraction of retrieved documents that are relevant.
– Recall measures the fraction of relevant documents successfully retrieved.
– Fall-out measures the proportion of non-relevant documents retrieved.

F-score / F-measure
– The F-score is the weighted harmonic mean of precision and recall.
– It provides a balanced evaluation of precision and recall.
– The F-score is commonly used in information retrieval evaluation.
– It helps assess the overall effectiveness of an IR system.
– The F-score considers both precision and recall in its calculation.
– F-measure is calculated using precision and recall.
– It is also known as the F1 measure.
– The general formula for F-measure is (2 * precision * recall) / (precision + recall).
– Other commonly used F-measures include F2 measure and F0.5 measure.
– F-measure combines information from both precision and recall to represent overall performance.

Precision at k and R-precision
– Recall is no longer a meaningful metric in modern information retrieval.
– Precision at k (P@k) is a useful metric that considers the top k retrieved documents.
– P@k fails to account for the positions of relevant documents among the top k.
– Scoring manually is easier for P@k as only the top k results need to be examined.
– Even a perfect system will have a score less than 1 on queries with fewer relevant results than k.
– R-precision requires knowing all relevant documents for a query.
– The number of relevant documents (R) is used as the cutoff for calculation.
– R-precision is equivalent to precision at the R-th position and recall at the R-th position.
– It is often highly correlated to mean average precision.
– R-precision is calculated as the fraction of relevant documents among the top R retrieved documents.

Mean Average Precision (MAP) and Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG)
– MAP is the mean of the average precision scores for a set of queries.
– It provides an overall measure of performance.
– MAP is calculated by summing the average precision scores for each query and dividing by the number of queries.
– It is commonly used in information retrieval evaluation.
– MAP takes into account the precision at different recall levels.
– DCG evaluates the usefulness of documents based on their position in the result list.
– It uses a graded relevance scale and penalizes lower-ranked relevant documents.
– DCG is calculated as the sum of relevance values logarithmically proportional to the position.
– Normalized DCG (nDCG) compares performances using an ideal DCG.
– nDCG values can be averaged to measure the average performance of a ranking algorithm.

Evaluation measures for an information retrieval (IR) system assess how well an index, search engine or database returns results from a collection of resources that satisfy a user's query. They are therefore fundamental to the success of information systems and digital platforms. The success of an IR system may be judged by a range of criteria including relevance, speed, user satisfaction, usability, efficiency and reliability. However, the most important factor in determining a system's effectiveness for users is the overall relevance of results retrieved in response to a query. Evaluation measures may be categorised in various ways including offline or online, user-based or system-based and include methods such as observed user behaviour, test collections, precision and recall, and scores from prepared benchmark test sets.

Evaluation for an information retrieval system should also include a validation of the measures used, i.e. an assessment of how well they measure what they are intended to measure and how well the system fits its intended use case. Measures are generally used in two settings: online experimentation, which assesses users' interactions with the search system, and offline evaluation, which measures the effectiveness of an information retrieval system on a static offline collection.

« Back to Glossary Index

Submit your RFP

We can't wait to read about your project. Use the form below to submit your RFP!

Gabrielle Buff
Gabrielle Buff

Just left us a 5 star review

Great customer service and was able to walk us through the various options available to us in a way that made sense. Would definitely recommend!

Stoute Web Solutions has been a valuable resource for our business. Their attention to detail, expertise, and willingness to help at a moment's notice make them an essential support system for us.

Paul and the team are very professional, courteous, and efficient. They always respond immediately even to my minute concerns. Also, their SEO consultation is superb. These are good people!

Paul Stoute & his team are top notch! You will not find a more honest, hard working group whose focus is the success of your business. If you’re ready to work with the best to create the best for your business, go Stoute Web Solutions; you’ll definitely be glad you did!

Wonderful people that understand our needs and make it happen!

Paul is the absolute best! Always there with solutions in high pressure situations. A steady hand; always there when needed; I would recommend Paul to anyone!

Vince Fogliani

The team over at Stoute web solutions set my business up with a fantastic new website, could not be happier

Steve Sacre

If You are looking for Website design & creativity look no further. Paul & his team are the epitome of excellence.Don't take my word just refer to my website "stevestours.net"that Stoute Web Solutions created.This should convince anyone that You have finally found Your perfect fit

Jamie Hill

Paul and the team at Stoute Web are amazing. They are super fast to answer questions. Super easy to work with, and knows their stuff. 10,000 stars.

Paul and the team from Stoute Web solutions are awesome to work with. They're super intuitive on what best suits your needs and the end product is even better. We will be using them exclusively for our web design and hosting.

Dean Eardley

Beautifully functional websites from professional, knowledgeable team.

Along with hosting most of my url's Paul's business has helped me with website development, graphic design and even a really cool back end database app! I highly recommend him as your 360 solution to making your business more visible in today's social media driven marketplace.

I hate dealing with domain/site hosts. After terrible service for over a decade from Dreamhost, I was desperate to find a new one. I was lucky enough to win...

Paul Stoute has been extremely helpful in helping me choose the best package to suite my needs. Any time I had a technical issue he was there to help me through it. Superb customer service at a great value. I would recommend his services to anyone that wants a hassle free and quality experience for their website needs.

Paul is the BEST! I am a current customer and happy to say he has never let me down. Always responds quickly and if he cant fix the issue right away, if available, he provides you a temporary work around while researching the correct fix! Thanks for being an honest and great company!!

Paul Stoute is absolutely wonderful. Paul always responds to my calls and emails right away. He is truly the backbone of my business. From my fantastic website to popping right up on Google when people search for me and designing my business cards, Paul has been there every step of the way. I would recommend this company to anyone.

I can't say enough great things about Green Tie Hosting. Paul was wonderful in helping me get my website up and running quickly. I have stayed with Green...